11/3/2022 0 Comments F1 2016 codexWe’ll easily be able to make a car that can rocket along at a thousand miles an hour, he thinks.īut we have to ask whether we would want a car where the seats and steering were optimized for speed, where safety options were discarded, where something like visibility or reliability were jettisoned for the sole virtue of going really fast. So our blithe designer decides that making a fast car is simple: we just look at each component of the car one by one, and we pick an available option for it entirely on the basis of which option makes the car go faster. Pretty soon they have to admit that just about everything in the car is going to affect the speed at which it travels. He doesn’t know much about cars, so he asks more qualified engineers about what elements of the car contribute to acceleration and velocity, and they start off with the obvious…details of the engine, fuel mixes, etc. Here’s an analogy for you: let’s say a novice car designer has decided that the one quality of an automobile that is most important is speed, raw speed. I wonder if any of those genes play a role in other processes in human physiology that might be affected by his plan? Note estimate of the number of genes that contribute to IQ: 10,000. The piece has a lot of errors, the worst of which other people have already discussed – but I want to talk about what I think is its strongest point. PZ Myers argues against Stephen Hsu’s genetic engineering proposal here – a disappointing attitude toward mad science for a guy whose blog header is a crocodile-duck hybrid.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |